“NBA Live” might be making a comeback, and that’s good for the basketball gaming world


Courtesy: http://www.businessinsider.com

Okay, “NBA 2K,” you’ve dominated the basketball gaming scene for far too long.

But change is imminent.

The “NBA Live” franchise released a trailer Saturday for its newest game, “NBA Live 18.” And in viewing the trailer, NBA Live appears to be attempting a serious comeback. The game will be on PlayStation 4 and Xbox One, and a free demo will be released in August.

For the first time in a while, gamers will have to give serious thought as to which basketball game they want.

It’s about time the basketball gaming community has some competition.

After 2008, Live gradually fell off – and 2K only went up. Live produced games in 2009 and 2010, but didn’t come out with a game from 2011-2013. Since then, Live has produced games from 2014-2016; the franchise didn’t produce a game for 2017.

While 2K began its rise in 2011, Live struggled to compete. A factor in 2K’s rise was the franchise implementing NBA legends. Michael Jordan graced the cover of NBA 2K11, setting a precedent for future basketball games. The game boasted a “Jordan Challenge” mode in which players could perform in some of Jordan’s brightest moments.

Before, no other basketball game let gamers play with legends such as Jordan, Julius “Dr. J” Erving or Magic Johnson. It was the prevalence of the legends that was different. Gamers could pit Jordan and other legends against current NBA players.

On top of legends entering the game, 2K spawned My Career, a mode in which gamers could create a player and rise through the ranks of the NBA. Despite not being as good in recent years, the career mode was perhaps the game’s best one from 2011-2015. In addition to the interactive My Career mode, 2K’s graphics have only improved with time. The graphics and presentation are nearly lifelike.

Compared to 2K, Live’s graphics have been a joke in past years. Culturally, 2K has taken over too. No longer are most gamers talking about balling out on Live. They’re talking about doing well on My Career. So as 2K rose, it had everything – and Live had nothing.

But now, Live has something. And it’s called “The One,” a game mode that looks like it could challenge My Career.

“The One” allows gamers to create a player. But in creating that player, gamers have two choices. In “The League,” players can try to gain fame in the NBA and lead their squad to the NBA title, or they can use their talents in “The Streets.”

The streets feature is a reason for Live’s intrigue this year. While the game’s graphics and presentation have improved – the first step to competing with 2K – Live has created a similar feature that looks better than one 2K already has: My Park.

Introduced in NBA 2K14 as “The Park”, My Park has always had potential. But the streets feature on “The One” has a chance to take that away. In the streets side of “The One,” gamers can take their players to legendary parks such as Rucker Park in New York or Venice Beach in California.

They can play 5-on-5, and the mode will reportedly have co-op and multiplayer options. In addition to being able to play at famous parks, gamers can also engage in a pro-am experience at The Drew League, which is based on the real-life pro-am league in Los Angeles.

NBA Live 18 doesn’t have an official release date yet. But with the demo coming out in August, the basketball gaming community might have to reconsider buying NBA 2K18.

Because a former gaming giant appears to be rising again.

Cavs-Warriors is this Generation’s Celtics-Lakers, and that’s a great thing


Image result for cavs warriors game 7
The Cavs-Warriors rivalry is similar to the Celtics-Lakers rivalry of the 1980s Courtesy: http://www.cnbc.com

My father grew up in the 1980s, when hip-hop was on the rise and disco was slowly beginning to fade.

And the NBA was beginning to flourish.

While his father rooted for the Boston Celtics, composed of Hall of Famers in Larry Bird, Kevin McHale and the late Dennis Johnson, my dad, great-uncle and the rest of the family rooted for the Los Angeles Lakers.

The Celtics were gritty, hard-nosed. And the Lakers were “Showtime,” flying up and down the floor with Magic Johnson throwing no-look passes to teammates such as James Worthy and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.

The Celtics and Lakers met three times in the NBA Finals during the ’80s, with the Lakers winning two titles to the Celtics’ one. Aside from the rivalry, though, another stat was more important: Throughout the decade, either the Celtics or the Lakers made an appearance on the NBA’s biggest stage.

The Celtics-Lakers rivalry ignited the NBA, and the league hasn’t looked back. Now, though, the league looks poised to begin another golden age.

With the Cleveland Cavaliers throttling the Celtics 135-102 on Thursday in Game 5 of the Eastern Conference Finals, they advanced to the NBA Finals and will play the Golden State Warriors.

The NBA will have its first Finals trilogy in league history.

The Warriors have been waiting for revenge, after blowing a 3-1 lead in last year’s Finals. And the Cavs are prepared to defend the throne. It’s a rivalry that needs to be appreciated.

Because even though the Cavs-Warriors rivalry is similar to the Celtics-Lakers battles of the ’80s, sports fans likely won’t see something of this magnitude again.

Despite this year’s NBA Finals historic nature, fans have lamented over the league’s lack of competition, especially in the postseason. The Warriors got to the Finals smoothly, entering them at 12-0. And aside from a hiccup in Game 3 of the Eastern Conference Finals, the Cavs are entering the Finals unscathed at 12-1.

My father fell in love with the NBA in the ‘80s, and I’ve been in love with the league since I was 10. He’s seen the original movie before, but myself and the rest of my generation are receiving a remake that is perhaps better than the original.

The Warriors are the league’s sweethearts, yet they are also the league’s villains. The team’s fans love to see 3-pointers launched at will, and the team’s haters despise those same 3-pointers that are sometimes made from well beyond the 3-point line.

Already boasting a tough trio of Steph Curry, Klay Thompson and Draymond Green, the Warriors added Kevin Durant, too, boosting their mystique. But harken back to the ’80s, and you’ll see a mirror image.

The Lakers and the Celtics had at least three stars in their respective starting lineups. Magic, Abdul-Jabbar, Worthy, Scott and Michael Cooper highlighted the Lakers. Dennis, Bird, McHale and Robert Parish headlined the Celtics.

Yes, the Warriors are stacked. They’re like the boss character on a videogame, a character that seems impossible to defeat.

But the Cavs are more than capable of competing against perhaps the league’s best team.

The Cavs have LeBron James, who sealed his spot Thursday as the NBA’s all-time points leader in the playoffs. James surpassed Michael Jordan, and the accomplishment is just one more thing to add to his journey of overtaking Jordan as the best player ever.

Add Kyrie Irving, Kevin Love and a solid bench to the mix, and the Finals is set to be epic again.

As the Cavs finished defeating the Celtics, my father and I sat on the couch, watching in awe. He began to talk about those old Celtics squads, even the ones composed of legendary players such as Sam Jones, Bill Russell and John Havlicek. These were players his father cheered for, along with the ’80s Celtics.

My father wanted the Showtime Lakers to prevail in the ‘80s, but in 2017, there is no opposition between father and son. We both love the Cavs.

But somewhere, perhaps another father-son duo is already beginning their heated arguments about these two teams that have captivated NBA fans for the past three years.

Celtics fall 92-91 against Wizards, fail to close out the series


With under two seconds left in Friday’s game, Boston Celtics guard Isaiah Thomas heaved a turnaround 3-pointer toward the hoop. If it went in, the Celtics would have gone to the Eastern Conference Finals to play the Cleveland Cavaliers.

Thomas and the rest of the team walked into the Verizon Center wearing all black before the game, taking a jab at the Washington Wizards who did the same thing back in January.

It was supposed to be a funeral – the Celtics were supposed to finish the Wizards.

But as the ball clanked off the rim, the Celtics quickly proceeded to walk back to the locker room, their heads lowered in defeat. And Wizards guard John Wall stood atop the scorer’s table, yelling at the crowd.

The Celtics, who were up 3-2 in the series, lost to the Wizards 92-91 in Game 6 of the Eastern Conference Semifinals, failing to close out the series.

A Game 7 awaits the Celtics on Monday at TD Garden, and now a funeral of their own is imminent.

“We realize there are some things certainly that you could do better throughout the course of the game, but I thought we really competed,” coach Brad Stevens said.

The Celtics were up 91-89 with under 10 seconds left in the game, but then Wall hit a deep 3-pointer.

Wall wasn’t ready to be buried yet, but the Celtics had him and the Wizards in a bad spot at the end of the game, for the Celtics had chances to win.

“Avery (Bradley) hit a big shot, Al (Horford) hit a big shot,” Stevens said. “I thought we were going to be able to get one for Kelly (Olynyk) there at the end. But ultimately, the shot that Wall hit was the biggest.”

With 39 seconds left in the game, Bradley made a jumper to put the Celtics up 89-87. The Wizards then came back down, tying the game at 89.

After the Wizards tied the game, Thomas passed the ball to Horford, and Horford banked in a 16-foot jumper. From there, the Celtics couldn’t prevail.

This game likely has a different outcome if the Celtics even played just a bit better offensively. Thomas had perhaps his worst game of the series, and Bradley and Horford had to carry the team.

Thomas didn’t emerge until the end of the game, but by then it was too late. He finished with 27 points, but only made eight shots from the field.

Bradley finished the game with 27 points, his stellar play being a factor in why the Celtics competed. Thomas almost had a James Harden-like disappearance, even with his solid late-game play.

In the past four games, Thomas has averaged 19.2 points per game. Bradley has led the Celtics in the latest games of this series, but the Celtics need both players to play well.

Thomas’ struggles are not unique to him, though. The rest of the team wallowed in a pit of poor offense in Game 6, only posting five bench points.

The all-black attire was initially a nice touch before the game. It was a punch toward the Wizards, who the Celtics despise.

Stevens didn’t seem pleased about the outfits before the game, though, claiming he didn’t even know about the team-wide arrangement.

Not-so-subtle outfits aside, though, Game 7 awaits.

“We’re going to have to play really well Monday to have a chance to win,” Stevens said.

Correction: A previous version of this article said “With 39 seconds left in the game, Bradley made a jumper to put the Celtics up 89-97.” That has been changed so the score is the correct 89-87. Also, the previous version said Wall’s shot sealed the win. That has been removed, as it’s incorrect. 

Andrew Bogut’s Injury is Unfortunate, But The Cavs Never Really Needed Him


Cleveland Cavaliers’ Andrew Bogut warms up before an NBA basketball game between the Miami Heat and the Cleveland Cavaliers, Monday, March 6, 2017, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)
http://www.si.com/nba/2017/03/06/andrew-bogut-cleveland-cavaliers-leg-injury-news

The Cleveland Cavaliers won the NBA title last season without a legitimate rim protector. Standing at 7 feet 1 inches, Timofey Mozgov was not an effective big man. LeBron James, the quintessential positionless player, led the Cavs with 16 blocks during the Finals.

Mozgov, the Cavs’ tallest player last season, was borderline useless, not being able to run the floor well for dunks or succeed in the pick and roll. He averaged five minutes per game in the Finals for a reason.

So, why did the Cavs feel as though they needed to bring in Andrew Bogut?

Bogut earned a buyout with the Philadelphia 76ers after being traded from the Dallas Mavericks. The Cavs picked him up, and he made his debut Monday night against the Miami Heat.

But not even playing a minute, Bogut fractured his left tibia, his leg colliding with Heat forward Okaro White. Bogut will be out indefinitely.

James spoke about Bogut’s injury, saying that the Cavs were excited about adding Bogut to the roster. The Cavs were justified in being excited about their addition; adding a player of Bogut’s size is never a bad thing.

But the addition wasn’t necessary.

Despite Bogut’s unfortunate injury, the Cavs have big men. Not all of them are healthy, but even so, it’s the regular season; the Cavs don’t need all their big men right now. Tristan Thompson grabs rebounds, Channing Frye stretches the floor, and at 6 feet 11 inches, Frye can at least provide a big body. Kevin Love, the Cavs’ best big, has been out with a left knee injury since February.

Though Love is out, the Cavs (42-20) are the top team in the Eastern Conference. The Boston Celtics are three games out of first place, and guard Isaiah Thomas hasn’t liked the team’s “experimenting” lately.

The Celtics are the only team in the Eastern Conference that has a legitimate chance of dethroning the Cavs — and their chance isn’t even that high, with Thomas being the Celtics’ lone option on offense.

Along with Love, the Cavs are waiting for J.R. Smith to return. Smith suffered a thumb injury in December 2016, but the Cavs are hopeful he can return soon.

When Love and Smith return, the Cavs will have returned, too. For the Cavs, a team that has suffered injuries throughout the season, will be in position to win their second straight title with the team at full strength.

The Cavs will have James — with him alone, anything is possible. But on top of that, they will have Kyrie Irving, Love and a bench that will perhaps be one of the best in the NBA. Frye, Richard Jefferson, Iman Shumpert, Kyle Korver and Deron Williams will be part of a second unit that will help maintain the starters’ success.

Sure, the addition of Bogut was nice. But it was like buying an Xbox One when you already had a PlayStation 4. Bogut wouldn’t have been that much of a difference maker.